Dec 1

For the second year running, Britney Spears has topped the Yahoo Top 10 searches.

Britney tops Yahoo searches for 2008

Britney tops Yahoo searches for 2008

When comparing the list to 2007, you will actually notice it hasn’t actually changed that much with other stalwarts such as WWE and Jessica Alba also featuring prominently

The top 10 list for 2008

1. Britney Spears
2. WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment)

3. Barack Obama
4. Miley Cyrus
5. RuneScape
6. Jessica Alba
7. Naruto
8. Lindsay Lohan

9. Angelina Jolie
10. American Idol

(Bold Italic denotes visibility in 2007)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Blogsvine
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlogMemes
  • Propeller
Nov 7

I, like many have been following the recent events in the US election, with the fight for the White House. It was therefore interesting to see the influence online has played in the campaign. Two recent articles have really struck a cord as a result.

Firstly, Sage Lewis highlighted the importance of online (and in particular Search and Social Media) played in Obamas rise to the White House. In his article, Sage mentioned a number of interesting statistics, namely:

  • There are nearly 2 million links to Obama’s website, nearly twice as much as those pointing to John McCains website.
  • According to statistics released by Rubicon Consulting, “Democrats are more active online than Republicans. Democrats are more likely to participate in online communities, and say they’re more heavily influenced in their voting decisions by information they find online.”
  • Obama’s campaign had social media at its heart, not just in terms of the site itself, but also in terms of the personnel involved. The involvement of Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, shows the importance of social media within the strategy.

The second article of particular interest to search was Kate Kay on Clickz. In the article, Kate highlighted that Obama’s campaign spent nearly $8 million through October to Google, Yahoo, Facebook, news Web sites, ad networks, and in-game ad firm Massive (which I talked about at the recent Interactive Marketing show in Manchester). In particular it is interesting to see where the money was spent.

  • Just over $4 Million on Paid Search - roughly broken down $3.5 Million to Google, with Yahoo accounting for about an eighth of that, with $673000.
  • Nearly $8 million spent on online ads.
  • Interestingly, the spend on Social Media comes to the fore. Nearly three quarters of the social media budget used in September alone, with Facebook taking the lions share.
  • The use of MSN owned Massive Incorporated (well worth a look) was interesting alone. The campaign placed ads pushing an early voting message in EA games, including a racing game called “Burnout Paradise,” targeting them to players in 10 battleground states.
  • Ad networks were a particular focus with more than $600,000 was paid to a variety of networks throughout the year, including AOL’s Advertising.com, Collective Media, Undertone Networks, Burst Media, Quigo, DrivePM, Pulse360, Specific Media, and online video networks Broadband Enterprises and Tremor Media.
  • Local online media targeting also saw significant spend with around $100000 being spent.

Politics is an area many people have an opinion about, and it is therefore suprising it is often not integral to modern day political campaigns, however it is encouraging to see more and more focus given to Online. In particular key channels such as Search (inc Online PR/Blogging), Display Online Brand Management (and monitoring in particular), should be a fundamental part of any modern day political framework.

Given the noise that has been generated on Twitter by many of my search colleagues with regards to the US Elections, it is suprising that McCains camp didn’t use online as a bigger battleground, and I personally think this is the first of a more digitally focussed policital landscape moving forward, as even we in the UK start using online as part of the political juggernaut.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Blogsvine
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlogMemes
  • Propeller
Oct 17

Linkbuilding: The ultimate Link?

Posted by Peter Young in SEO, Yahoo on 17th Oct 2008| | No Comments »

Looking around doing a technical audit for a client, I had to go into the Yahoo Directory to explain why they should consider using page specific robots management to alter what was displayed on organic Yahoo searches.

In doing so, I stumbled across front page of the Yahoo Directory, something I will be honest I havent been to directly for a good while. On the front page, was a blog article as follows (something I will be honest I hadn’t seen before):

Yahoo Directory Blogs - PR8

Yahoo Directory Blogs - PR8

Now I may have missed something here, but the Yahoo Directory front page is a PR 8 page (yes I know PR is by default a stale method of measurement but still). The links are not nofollowed, there is no page level robots management and the robots.txt file does not appear to be including any reference to the directory itself, thus I would suggest those links in question carry significant weighting.

It was also interesting to notice Yahoo’s apparent use of Google Webmaster Tools verification on the Yahoo Directory, certainly as neither uk.yahoo.com or us.yahoo.com portals seemed to use it

Yahoo source - notice the verify-v1 tagging

Yahoo source - notice the verify-v1 tagging

Maybe just me, but could this be further evidence of closer Google/Yahoo relationships…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Blogsvine
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlogMemes
  • Propeller
Sep 17

The importance of SEO localisation

Posted by Peter Young in Google, SEO, Yahoo on 17th Sep 2008| | No Comments »

I have been involved in a number of discussions as to the merits/demerits of .co.uk vs .com visibility primarily with Google. With the ongoing evolution of the algorithms, with localisation and relevancy being at the heart of it, its important to understand how this impacts on searchers. For this reason, understanding where such users are searching is very important.

Hitwise are one of the best aggregators of such data. Interestingly enough, they have recently published an overview of the leading search engines for August 2008, with the results as follows:

  • Google.co.uk (Google UK) - 73.13%
  • Google.com (Google Global/US) - 14.20%
  • uk.search.yahoo.com (Yahoo UK) - 3.37%
  • www.uk.ask.com (Ask) - 2.69%

Given many UK companies target UK customers, it is essential that your SEO strategy should at least pay reference to localisation of search. Google in particular rewards efforts to target your site to your local market by using metrics such as domain extension and hosting location to determine best fit.

If you aren’t thinking local - isn’t it about time you did.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Blogsvine
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlogMemes
  • Propeller