Oct 31

Getting the most out of a search conference

Posted by Peter Young in General, Top Tips on 31st Oct 2008| | No Comments »

Further to my post last week regarding a busy week for many search marketeers, it seemed appropriate to follow it up with a beginners guide to getting the most out of whatever conference you are attending. Most conferences these day are not cheap affairs, so heres my guide to getting the most out of them.

Have a clear motive.

There is no point in attending any of these conferences without a clear objective. It doesn’t necessarily need to be the attendance of a key speaker, it could just as easily be:

  • New Business – This obviously depends on which conference you are attending however many of these conferences provide a wealth of new business ops whether they be:
    • Speed Dating sessions – For example Business NorthWest at the GMEX in Manchester is providing a number of speed dating sessions for potential new business or business partnerships
    • Interaction with key decision makers – This will depend on show to show however these events can be great for making contact with a key new business target – for example SES tends to more industry focussed, whereas AdTech/InternetWorld show often see a higher number of client types in attendance
    • Displays – Many of these conferences allow vendors to highlight their goods and services. Certainly the likes of InternetWorld can be a great place to get your suppliers into line – whether it be your 3rd party bid management tool, analytics or even recruitment.
  • on that note – Recruitment. SES and some of the other more focussed conferences and shows can be a great place for recruitment. Whilst this is sort of unwritten, there is no doubting it goes on – and it can be a good time for getting the foundations in place for potential collaboration at a later date. (Just look what happened to me ;) )
  • Learning – Probably why 90% of us go to manyof these conferences. If you learn one good thing from the conference it can often be worth the attendance fee alone. Certainly there are some conferences that are better than others, certainly I was very impressed by the level and tone of the presentations at SES in London this year and the SMX line up is looking very good too. On that note I would highly recommend the following speakers
    • Bryan Eisenberg – FutureNow Inc
    • Jon Myers – MediaVest Manchester
    • any of the ComScore/Hitwise stuff – Normally some good titbits in there
    • Kevin Ryan
    • Matt Cutts or any of the other Google lot tbh – Mylie at SES was very good
    • Dixon Jones (Receptional)
    • Dave Naylor – never seen him personally but many people seem to talk very highly in terms of speaking
    • Erica Schmidt – Isobar
    • ….and please feel free to suggest any others below….

Don’t just focus on what happens during the day.

Think Rob Kerry put this best in his post “The Search Engine Groupie”

The majority of conference pass paying punters that attend these events are purely there to learn; many unaware of what’s happening in the background. The quiet whispers of idea exchanges over pints of black gold, and games of business card top trumps. For beginners, Search Engine Strategies offers a valuable selection of sessions to learn more about search marketing. For those who have reached the next level up though, such an occasion is even more valuable.

Thousands of Black Hats, White Hats, PPC Pink Hats and “Suits” gather in one place to get drunk together and network. I’ve still learnt things at the sessions of each SES I’ve attended (such as Video Search SEO tips at SES Chicago); but casually discussing new ways to build links, harness social media and further our part in keeping Matt Cutts’ team busy (Black Hat SEO = Googler Job Security) is worth the price of a conference ticket alone.

At many of these conferences many of the attendees will often congregate in the same places, certainly SES London and Hilton are always synonymous – however I would add dont just go harrasing who ever it is you want to talk to – be focussed, brief and polite. Certainly you will knmow if they want to continue the conversation further.

Be Prepared

Maybe its just the Boy Scout in me coming to the fore, however it certainly helps to be prepared at the conferences. This will help you get the best out of the conference and help you reach whatever objectives you may have

  • Random attendance probably isn’t the best approach – knowing which speakers you want to see, when you want to see them is probably a better course of action, and will ensure your trip doesn’t end in disappointment.
  • If you can try and leave a days grace either side of the conference dates when booking a hotel and flight. The best networking events tend to be on the day before the conference and on the last day.
  • Check the forums and blogs regularly and well in advance. Each major conference event will usually have an official thread or even Twitter trail detailing what parties are happening and where.
  • Mingle with major and niche search engines in the expo hall, they may have an invitation-only party for existing and potential clients that you could attend – (thanks rob)
  • Enjoy it – These conferences are not all business.
Oct 30

Google recently hosted their third webmaster chat event allowed some question time between webmasters and Google employees.

Below are a couple of the presentations from the event:

John’s slides on “Frightening Webmastering Myths”:

Jonathan’s slides on “Using the Not Found errors report in Webmaster Tools”:

Maile’s slides on “Where We’re Coming From”:

Much of the documents, in particular the frightening webmaster myths are pretty common sense, with only the following point standing out.

  • Duplicate Content will penalise your site – Google say this is a myth. However I would add this is a very generalised way of looking at it. Whilst Google are good at establising internal content duplication – people aren’t – and when many people talk about duplicate content (well me anyhow) – it is the human factor that is important. After all Google isn’t potentially giving me valuable linkage back – a human is – and if he links to the wrong site, I stand the chance of getting no significant benefit at all. Secondly, if I have hundreds of duplicated pages (or even four or five), which one is authoratitive. Providing one copy to a user reduces the chance of that link going somewhere irrelevant – surely good for both users and search engines?

    Duplicate content still doesn’t matter?

The Google Webmaster Central blog has announced they have posted a review of the live chat session.

Oct 30

SEO Company Spammer – Outing or not

Posted by Peter Young in Google, SEO, Search Engines on 30th Oct 2008| | No Comments »

There seems to be a huge debate going on, on a number of forums regarding Rand Fishkins recent post on the search engines apparent dealing (or non-dealings) with web spam. This is going on at:

  • Sphinn – 106 comments (and 129 sphinns) – http://sphinn.com/story/81937
  • SEOBook (SEO Police) – 47 comments – http://www.seobook.com/seo-police
  • BlogStorm -Outing Spammers in the “SEO Company” Search Results
  • and of course Rand’s original post -SEO Company Search Results – An Embarrassment to Google and the Other Engines- 146 commments
SEO Company - SEOMoz

SEO Company - SEOMoz example

Much of the debate seems focussed on Rand’s alleged outing of Los Angeles based NationalPositions.com. In his post, Rand posted the following lines

Let me cut straight to the point. I don’t have any problem with what NationalPositions.com is doing. They found a way to rank well, leveraged it and are now getting dozens, maybe hundreds of daily inquiries for SEO help from companies who want to emulate their success in their own markets. Where I struggle is with the engines claiming that SEO in this fashion doesn’t work and shouldn’t be effective, then rewarding this kind of behavior with clients who are now going to get and apply these exact same tactics. A relevant analogy might find the court system giving out win after win to attorneys pursuing frivolous lawsuits – propping up their background with winning records, thus ensuring that more needless cases enter the system.

I know web spam is hard. We actually tried to build a spam metric into Linkscape at launch and found it to be a real Mt. Everest sized problem. But after 10+ years in the game, to find Google, the leader in this arena, giving sitelinks on results like these just doesn’t sit well with me, and it shouldn’t sit well with anyone else who employs best practices in white hat SEO.

p.s. If you’re planning to report web spam of your own in the search engines (and technically, the behavior we’re observing above isn’t spam – it’s just directory link building), Google likes to receive it from your Webmaster Tools account, Yahoo! appreciates it at their Site Explorer Suggestions Center and Microsoft/Live has a spiffy forum. Many in the SEO sphere have found that, perplexingly, spam gets dealt with fastest when it’s blogged about – making sites like YOUmoz and Sphinn havens for this activity.

I would have to say, I agree with one of Rands staff on the blog post himself, that highlights the fact he isn’t actually ‘outing’ NationalPositions but rather highlighting that Google arent doing there job as well as they could be.

However in many peoples opinion – and I personally have to admit i can see where they are coming from it is two parts from the post above that get stuck in the throat, namely

“Let me cut straight to the point. I don’t have any problem with what NationalPositions.com is doing” – followed almost immediately by “Where I struggle is with the engines claiming that SEO in this fashion doesn’t work and shouldn’t be effective, then rewarding this kind of behavior with clients who are now going to get and apply these exact same tactics” and references to WebSpam.

Whether or not NationalPositions deserve to be number one – the answer is probably no. Its not the most inventive way of getting to the top, but its effective. Is it spam – in my opinion – not not really. Personally, the submission of sites to directories is something often practised by a number of prominent SEO practitioners, and surely such activity is not as bad as the use of High Scale Link Networks for the development of link acquisition

I would finish however – with the amount of exposure that Rand (and SEOMoz) have got out of this -and the furore that followed the LinkScape debate, Rand will have done himself no harm in terms of inbound linkage – however I can’t help thinking at the expense of a number of previous allies.

[The thoughts in the post above are Peter Young's personal viewpoints are not necessarily those of his employers or any other authors on the Holistic Search blog]

Oct 30

Holistic Search moves to new hosting

Posted by admin in General on 30th Oct 2008| | No Comments »

You may (or may not have noticed) a change in the look of the Holistic Search Marketing site over the last couple of days. This has co-incided with the migration of the site from its original wordpress.com shared hosting to a dedicated box – in order that we can add further functionality  and social media bits and bobs to the site itself,  something which was rather restricted on the original platform.

It also gives us the opportunity to provide a simple site migration overview over the next couple of days.

Oct 24

A busy week for search marketing

Posted by Peter Young in General, Paid Search, SEO on 24th Oct 2008| | No Comments »

Just been looking at events in November, and noticed a huge logjam of events round the first week of the month.

For us UK search marketing profs, there is Danny Sullivan’s SMX London, running from the 4th to 5th of November 2008 at the New Connaught Rooms in Covent Garden, London (with the (in)famous LondonSEO party wedged inbetween. One for both search marketing bods and potentially clients alike, its always good for a bit of Search Marketing celebrity spotting if nothing else (MediaVest’s very own Jon Myers will be there and is always worth listening to, but there is also the likes of Bigmouthmedia’s Andrew Girdwood, Key Relevance’s Christine Churchill, Alltogether Digital’s Ciaran Norris, Broncos Dave Naylor and (SEM’s serial Mr Fixit- sorry Dixon), Receptionals Dixon Jones – full SMX London agenda here.

For those further up north – there is also the option of the Internet Marketing Show at Manchester’s GMEX on the 4th and 5th of November. Whilst this is a bit more broad in terms of subject coverage it promises to be a superb function with the likes of Steak, MediaVest and MediaEdge all in attendance.

However it is a shame that there is also a big US function on in the same week which I can’t help has affected the potential turnout of some of the US ‘welebrities’. The Ad-Tech New York show takes place from November the 3rd to November the 6th 2008 and includes the likes of Kevin Ryan on the speaker list.

Whichever conference you are attending or thinking of attending – Enjoy.

Oct 24

Yes, we are looking for you to contribute content to the Holistic Search blog. Whilst this will not be an opportunitity for an unashamed linkfest and plug ofyour latest product or service, it will be an opportunity for the lucky contributors to share the views with the wider public.

I will be approaching a number of prominent search marketeers to try and get their views, however we are not just looking for the Andrew Girdwood’s and Danny Sullivan’s of the world on this, but also some budding up and coming bloggers.

If you are interested in contributing to the cause, drop us a line, dm or email with an outline of the topic. Thanks and happy writing….

Oct 21

The importance of thinking local

Posted by Peter Young in Google, SEO on 21st Oct 2008| | No Comments »

Following on from Michael Grays (aka GrayWolf) post on Ferraris SEO and PPC Practise in the States (or lack of it), I decided to take a look at how they fare on a European basis, with a couple of suprises.

The biggest suprise (suprisingly) was their visibility in the core Italian market

Ferrari IT

Ferrari IT

On many prominent brand searches, you will often found what are termed sitelinks (simplistically – given by Google where they deem a site to be authoritative enough). In Ferraris case they have six sitelinks (looks like two have been blocked), all in English.

Now you may ask yourself so what – however the issue here is, the search was performed on Google.it, thus the vast majority of users are going to be Italian, speak Italian and thus be looking for the Italian site. Given the vast array of interests Ferrari have, it is suprising therefore that further consideration hasn’t been given to make these SItelinks more ‘useful’.

It should be noted that local SEO best practise seems to have been followed on many of the other ‘local’ sites such as Germany, and even the UK (which has its very own .co.uk site), which made it all the more suprising when looking at the Italian visibility.  Moving further afield I would suggest similar potential issues may also affect new potential markets such as China and the Middle East (see below)

Ferrari AE

Ferrari AE

In my opinion, this is one of the easiest things to get right from an SEO perspective these days (particularly with Google Webmaster Tools), and should be considered particularly in key local markets. Whilst there is the consideration, that many users will speak English, it is always worth as they say – keeping things simple.

Oct 17

Linkbuilding: The ultimate Link?

Posted by Peter Young in SEO, Yahoo on 17th Oct 2008| | 1 Comment »

Looking around doing a technical audit for a client, I had to go into the Yahoo Directory to explain why they should consider using page specific robots management to alter what was displayed on organic Yahoo searches.

In doing so, I stumbled across front page of the Yahoo Directory, something I will be honest I havent been to directly for a good while. On the front page, was a blog article as follows (something I will be honest I hadn’t seen before):

Yahoo Directory Blogs - PR8

Yahoo Directory Blogs - PR8

Now I may have missed something here, but the Yahoo Directory front page is a PR 8 page (yes I know PR is by default a stale method of measurement but still). The links are not nofollowed, there is no page level robots management and the robots.txt file does not appear to be including any reference to the directory itself, thus I would suggest those links in question carry significant weighting.

It was also interesting to notice Yahoo’s apparent use of Google Webmaster Tools verification on the Yahoo Directory, certainly as neither uk.yahoo.com or us.yahoo.com portals seemed to use it

Yahoo source - notice the verify-v1 tagging

Yahoo source - notice the verify-v1 tagging

Maybe just me, but could this be further evidence of closer Google/Yahoo relationships…

Oct 17

The Internet Marketer’s Handbook

Posted by Peter Young in General, Research on 17th Oct 2008| | No Comments »

When you come across a great resource, it seems only right to share it with others. Danny Dover over at SEOMoz (Yes them again), has put together a group of links to key tools and resources every online marketer should be aware of – called the Internet Marketing Handbook.

Good for both beginners, with enough in there to keep the even the likes of David Naylor happy (well Dan anyway), its well worth grabbing five minutes having a look at.

Oct 17

Google has reported a significant increase in profits for the third quarter which ended September 1 – a 26% surge to $1.35bn (£778m) to beat analyst forecasts. This despite the global financial crisis and overall downturn in the advertising market.

Revenues for the quarter could be broken down as folllows:

  • Revenues including commissions to affiliated advertisers, rose 31% to $5.54bn (3.19bn).
  • Paid Search up by 18% compared to Q3 2007

This was in keeping with recent Online Marketings statistitcs reported by the IAB report, which highlighted the following figures

  • £1.682.5m was spent during H1 2008 – an increase over 348.2m year on year
  • Thats a 21% increase on H1 2007
  • Despite many markets shrinking (Direct Mail 5.9%, Outdoor 4.2%), Online continued to grow significantly – up by early 20.9%
  • Market share up to nearly 19% up fromm 15.9% in H2 2007
  • Spend in online was only just below Press Display (1737.7m) and Television (1951.8m)

Whilst Google has seen strong performance, it is testament to the increased priority of online in the marketing mix. Certainly SEO has seen a strong surge in interest according to recent Google trends, and I would suggest SEO budgets are also likely to see significant growth during 2009/2010.

SEO vs PPC in the UK

SEO vs PPC in the UK

« Previous Entries